3 Comments

Thanks Callum. It's very valuable to have a systematic review like this for various asset classes.

A couple of comments if I may, while acknowledging that they may be difficult to incorporate into your frame work:

1) Gold is an obvious omission from some charts/ tables given it's well accepted diversification role in a portfolio.

2) While I tend to agree that US Treasuries will have their day once something serious breaks, there is a risk that pro-cyclical fiscal largess by US Govt, the BoJ changes to YCC and US sanctions on Russian FX reserves are shifting the longer term role of US Treasuries. I don't know how this can be incorporated into a broad asset allocation assessment other than to acknowledge the seeming significance of these moves and the risks they pose to the traditional valuation metrics.

thanks and regards

Bruce

Expand full comment

re 2): forgot to mention the Fed's QT program (if they are serious and able).

Expand full comment

Thanks Bruce, I will think about how to include gold in the monthly... but I do cover it when things get interesting in the weekly e.g. https://topdowncharts.substack.com/p/weekly-insights-edition-116

For bonds, interesting points, I will ponder how to quantitatively include those, but indeed to factor them in, especially BOJ policy. But in general agree that the outlook for bonds is less than clear-cut as I still have a couple of indicators flaggin potential upside risk in yields..

Expand full comment